- The Chicago 312
- Posts
- šØ Chicago 312: Curfews, City Cash, and Collapse
šØ Chicago 312: Curfews, City Cash, and Collapse
This week in Chicago Politics: cops want a curfew button, billionaires are still ducking taxes, and tech bros coordinate better than our entire movement
Welcome to Chicago 312, your weekly hit of Chicago politics: 3 Headlines. 1 Big Question. 2 Red Flags. Every Week. Subscribe here.
What To Know This Week: Authoritarian creep disguised as supporting the teens, progressive taxes, and why the left still canāt coordinate better than a Signal chat full of Palantir freaks.
š„ 3 Headlines: Curfew Power Grab, Revenue Fights, A Lawsuit That Should Be Louder

Tyler Pasciak LaRiviere/Sun-Times
1. The Curfew Bill Is a Trojan Horse for Policing Power
From WBEZ and Block Club: The latest ācurfewā proposal in City Hallāsponsored by Ald. Brian Hopkins, backed by downtown alderfolks, isnāt about kids. Itās about expanding police authority, pure and simple. The ordinance would let CPD declare curfews anytime, anywhere, with no public notice, no oversight, and no standard of evidence.
Hopkins and co. claim itās a tool to stop āteen takeoversā downtown. But in practice, it would let the city preemptively criminalize any gathering in any neighborhood under the banner of disruption. Itās a legal loophole designed to turn public space into a police-controlled zone, as Unraveled Press pointed out.
Why does this matter? Because this is how authoritarianism creeps in. Not through declarations, but through policy. Through normalized āsafety measuresā that end up targeting Black and Brown youth, queer kids, and anyone who makes the wrong person uncomfortable in public.
Right now, the Johnson administration hasnāt endorsed itābut they havenāt condemned it either. Why not?
2. Progressive Revenue Gets Framed as Fantasy
Letās be blunt: the city needs money. A coalition of progressive orgs (including CTU, ICIRR, Peopleās Lobby, and more) dropped a detailed, bold, and deeply sensible set of revenue proposals: digital ad taxes, billionaire wealth taxes, GILTI loophole closures, and a surcharge on private equity carried interest. Combined? Over $7B.
Mayor Brandon Johnson went to Springfield today with a laundry list of "reasonable asks" that already feel half-defeated. If we donāt make the case emotionallyāand call these demands what they are, the floor as the federal government is being guttedāweāre ceding the narrative before the first vote is cast. This is a major loss when our Governor is setting the stage for a national run based primarily on his ability to govern as a āresisterā.
If we donāt shape the emotional terrain around these demandsāif we donāt call this the bare minimumāwe will lose, again, before negotiations even start.
3. Quiet Lawsuit: Chicago Sues Trump Over Federal Worker Firings
While all eyes were on revenue drama, the city quietly joined a federal lawsuit against Trumpās administration over mass firings of federal workers. Itās easy to missābut itās one of the few direct legal challenges Johnson has made to Trumpās authoritarian creep.
The lesson? Our governmentās capacity to function is being gutted from the inside, and every time Chicago takes a stand on federal overreach, it mattersāeven if itās quiet. We need 10x more of this, and louder.
š§ 1 Big Question: Why Canāt the Left Coordinate Like Tech Bros on Signal?

Al Lucca/Semafor
I sent this piece on tech bro right wing group chats to many people, then I read the scathing take on it from Max Read and Garbage Day. In the process of talking this article through with many Chicago organizers (btw, we DONāT really have a conversational focused group chat, beyond calls to action, thatās progressive, thatās cross-movement, unless Iām sharing how uncool I am without knowing it rn), and doing lots of dunking on the right, I came to some fairly obvious conclusions.
Yes, group chats arenāt new. We have them. We've had them. Thatās not the issue.
The issue is that most movement group chats are either ghost towns or pure logistics hubs. Theyāre built for turnout, not discourse. When I asked around, national organizers said the same thing: thereās no real space where line development happens. No space where people argue about framing, experiment in good faith, or hash out real political differences without posturing.
Itās not a tech problem. Itās a power problem. Thereās no shared incentive to coordinate messaging if thereās no shared material base or line to defend. What the right hasāthrough fear, funders, or fascismāis alignment. We have vibes, and right now, vibes donāt scale, especially not with another group chat.
This isnāt a call to start another Signal thread. Iām not doing that, and you shouldnāt either. What we actually need is vulnerability, not viralityāa way to talk honestly about collapse, coordination, and what clarity could look like before we lose more ground.
What kind of structure do you think it would take to get better, wider-spread line development in Chicago?
Let me know in the comments, through texting, or anonymous angry DMs.
š© 2 Red Flags: Collapse Clubs and Campaign Ghosts

Illustration: Fromm Studio/The Guardian
1. āAll of His Guns Will Do Nothing for Himā: The Lefty Prepper Surge
From The Guardian: More liberals are preppingābut not with bunkers and bullets. With dry goods, trauma kits, solar panels, and deep community ties. The right-wing prepper fantasy is isolation. The leftās version? Mutual ruggedization.
The quote that haunts: āThe first time this guy in his MAGA hat falls down the stairs and breaks his leg and it gets gangrenous and neither he nor anyone in his family are doctors, heās done.ā
What does this mean for Chicago? We need our own ruggedization plan. Not just for climate. For authoritarian collapse. For infrastructure failure. For when the grid goes.
2. Kamala HQ Wasnāt EnoughāAnd Neither Is Our Digital Strategy
From Rachel Kartenās interview with Rob Flaherty: Kamala HQ had viral heat. It broke through. But it didnāt win votes. The real lesson? You canāt meme your way out of culture decay.We need offline actions that generate online narrative oxygen. We need candidates who do shit that lives online because it was worth doing, not because it was engineered for trend cycles.
This isnāt a failure of digital. Itās a failure of ownership. Strategy without agency is noise. And the left keeps training brilliant digital staffers to execute without ever giving them command.
Thatās It for This Week.
Authoritarian creep is outpacing our city budgets, our digital strategies, and sometimes our guts. But Chicago isnāt done yet. Weāve still got time, traction, and each otherāif we move.
šØ Forward this to a friend,
š§µ Reply with your hot takes, what you hate, or with questions.
š Subscribe if you havenāt yet.
All typos are intentional 4D chess.
Reply